Ken-Betwa Project Sparks Adivasi Resistance Over Displacement

Why in the News ?

Adivasi communities in Madhya Pradesh are protesting against displacement caused by the Ken-Betwa river-linking project. Villagers argue that monetary compensation cannot replace their forests, land, livelihoods, cultural identity and community life, raising concerns about rehabilitation, tribal rights and environmental costs.

Ken-Betwa Project and Its Intended Objectives:

●     The Ken-Betwa River Linking Project aims to transfer water from the Ken River to the Betwa River through a nearly 231-km canal.

●     The Union Cabinet approved the project in 2021, primarily to provide irrigation and drinking water to water-stressed areas of Bundelkhand.

●     Bundelkhand covers 13 districts across Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh and is characterised by water scarcity, poverty and recurrent droughts.

●     The project involves construction of the Daudhan Dam, which is expected to submerge several villages.

●     Around 22 villages in Panna and Chhatarpur districts are expected to be affected through direct submergence or compensatory displacement.

●     Since the project is located within the Panna Tiger Reserve, concerns have also emerged regarding forest diversion, biodiversity loss and wildlife habitat.

Why Adivasis Are Opposing the Project

●     Villagers argue that financial compensation cannot compensate for ancestral land, forests, rivers, religious sites and community relationships.

●     Eligible affected persons aged 18 years or above in February 2024 are reportedly entitled to ₹12.5 lakh compensation and ₹5 lakh per acre of acquired land.

●     Many Adivasi households, however, reportedly lack formal land titles (pattas), creating concerns regarding compensation eligibility.

●     Communities depend heavily on mahua, tendu leaves, charwa and other forest produce for livelihoods and household expenses.

●     Villagers demand “forest for forest, land for land, water for water and village for village”, emphasising collective rehabilitation.

●     Adivasi women have led the Chita Aandolan (symbolic pyre protest) against displacement and loss of cultural identity.

●     They also allege inadequate consultation, insufficient notice before demolition and excessive use of force during protests.

About Tribal Rights and Development:

●     Forest Rights Act, 2006: Recognises the rights of Scheduled Tribes and traditional forest dwellers over forest resources and habitation.

●     PESA Act, 1996: Strengthens Gram Sabha participation in governance of Scheduled Areas.

●     LARR Act, 2013: Provides provisions for fair compensation, rehabilitation and resettlement in land acquisition.

●     Development projects affecting tribal communities must balance economic development, environmental sustainability and social justice.

●     Proper Social Impact Assessment, Gram Sabha consultation, transparent land surveys and livelihood-based rehabilitation are essential.

●     Rehabilitation should prioritise community continuity and restoration of livelihoods, rather than merely providing monetary compensation.